A comparison of some methods for predicting creep strain and rupture under cyclic loading

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author J. M. Clarke en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2014-10-20T11:05:24Z
dc.date.available 2014-10-20T11:05:24Z
dc.date.issued 1967 en_US
dc.identifier.other ARC/CP-1020 en_US
dc.identifier.uri https://reports.aerade.cranfield.ac.uk/handle/1826.2/1033
dc.description.abstract There are many good reasons for attempting to predict creep behaviour under conditions of varying stress and temperature from data derived from tests perfomed at constant stress and temperature. This Report starts by describing the most straightforward hypotheses at present used for this purpose. Computed results for cyclic variations have shown that (i) the "strain hardening" and "life fraction" hypotheses predict very similar rupture times, (ii) the times to a given creep strain do not depend on the frequency of the cycles or the sequence of loading within the cycles providing there are several (10 or more) cycles involved, (iii) when a substantial proportion (more than about two-thirds) of the creep life shows a "tertiary" behaviour the "time hardening" hypothesis predicts the shortest rupture times for the same cyclic loading. A method is demonstrated for evaluating effective mean stresses or temperatures for any cyclic conditions according to either strain or time hardening hypotheses. en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries Aeronautical Research Council Current Papers en_US
dc.title A comparison of some methods for predicting creep strain and rupture under cyclic loading en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search AERADE


Browse

My Account