Tests in the R.A.E. 10-ft x 7-ft high speed wind tunnel on drop tanks fitted to two swept-back wings Part 1 Comparison of under-wing and wing-tip installations Part 2 Comparison of various under-wing drop-tank arrangements

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author D. E. Hartley en_US
dc.contributor.author A. B. Haines en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2014-10-21T15:53:48Z
dc.date.available 2014-10-21T15:53:48Z
dc.date.issued 1952 en_US
dc.identifier.other ARC/R&M-2951 en_US
dc.identifier.uri https://reports.aerade.cranfield.ac.uk/handle/1826.2/3514
dc.description.abstract The report describes tests made in the Royal Aircraft Establishment 10-ft × 7-ft High Speed Wind Tunnel on drop tanks, fitted to two wings, having the same plan-form with a sweepback of 40 deg and an aspect ratio of 3.5, but differing in thickness/chord ratio, being 10 per cent and 8.5 per cent thick respectively. Part I compares the results obtained with the drop tanks mounted in two alternative positions on the 10 per cent thick wing : under the wing at about mid-semi-span, supported by an 8.5 per cent thick strut or alternatively, at the wing tip in a mid-wing position. Part II compares the results obtained with several different types of under-wing installation, e.g., with different designs of strut or alternatively dispensing with the strut and fitting the tanks directly on to the lower surface of the wing. The latter are referred to as 'nacelle-type' tanks. Most of the tanks had a fineness ratio of 8 : 1. en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries Aeronautical Research Council Reports & Memoranda en_US
dc.title Tests in the R.A.E. 10-ft x 7-ft high speed wind tunnel on drop tanks fitted to two swept-back wings Part 1 Comparison of under-wing and wing-tip installations Part 2 Comparison of various under-wing drop-tank arrangements en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search AERADE


Browse

My Account