dc.contributor.author |
D. W. Bryer |
en_US |
dc.contributor.author |
D. E. Walshe |
en_US |
dc.contributor.author |
H. C. Garner |
en_US |
dc.date.accessioned |
2014-10-21T15:54:16Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2014-10-21T15:54:16Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
1955 |
en_US |
dc.identifier.other |
ARC/R&M-3037 |
en_US |
dc.identifier.uri |
https://reports.aerade.cranfield.ac.uk/handle/1826.2/3605 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
Seven pressure probes have been tested in a uniform stream in order to ascertain the best types for measuring velocity and flow direction. Methods of calibration are discussed in section 8 together with the effects of wind speed, flow direction and turbulence on the calibration factors (section 4). The performance of three of the probes in the turbulent boundary layer of a flat plate is analysed and their accuracies compared when they are used to estimate displacement and momentum thicknesses (section 6). The Conrad probe is proved superior to other types for boundary-layer measurements. Further research on the lines indicated in section 7 is necessary before the best type of probe for use in regions of separated flow can be ascertained. The main features of the velocity-measuring probes are listed in Table 4. For measuring static pressure in three-dimensional flow, a disc type of probe is described and shown to be insensitive to flow direction and scale effect (section 5). |
en_US |
dc.relation.ispartofseries |
Aeronautical Research Council Reports & Memoranda |
en_US |
dc.title |
Pressure probes selected for three-dimensional flow measurement |
en_US |