Abstract:
A simple theoretical argument leads to the conclusion that if Griffith's crack hypothesis is true, rods of brittle materials when subjected to radial pressure should fracture at a mean pressure equal to the average tensile stress at failure in a tensile test. In practice, it is not convenient to do tensile tests on account of the difficulty of gripping the test pieces and of procuring axial loading. In the present series of tests, the mean radial pressure at fracture of three types of glass rod has been compared with the tensile stress at fracture computed from bending tests. The mean fracture stresses developed in the two types of test differ significantly though not greatly. When departures of the experimental test conditions from ideal conditions are considered, they appear adequate to account for the difference. The results, therefore, are not in disagreement with the deduction made from Griffith's crack hypothesis that fracture in radial pressure occurs at a pressure numerically equal to the tensile breaking stress.
